July 3rd, 2009 by admin

The following information was sent to me by a professional Monitor of Clinical Trials, on June 12, 2009:

“Of course today, Novartis announces that they have the Swine Flu vaccine. Look at the dates”

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/01/15/US-to-produce-cell-based-flu-vaccine/UPI-43271232050101/

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090612/ap_on_he_me/eu_switzerland_novartis_flu_vaccine

The article above states that “WHO says drugmakers will likely have vaccines approved and ready for sale after September.”

Four months?  From June to September? To do animal safety testing, then human safety and efficacy testing?

No way – that should take “about 8 to 10 months” according to Rangappa Ramachandra, program director and lead scientist of immunology services at Covance.

Four months to discover, test and manufacture a novel vaccine would be a little fishy, even under the best of circumstances.

Note above that Novartis’ “vaccine was made in cells, rather than grown in eggs as is usually the case with vaccines”.

Really? A whole new process? Weeks ahead of expectation? According to UPI:

“Currently, influenza vaccines licensed by the Food and Drug Administration are made in specialized chicken eggs using a process that has changed little over the past five decades.
In place of eggs, cell-based vaccine production uses laboratory-grown cells that are capable of hosting a growing virus.”

Really! What kind of cells would those be? Canine! Doggie!!

So, let’s get this straight: Novartis injects a virus into puppy kidney cells, “where it multiplies. The cells’ outer walls are then removed, harvested, purified, and inactivated.”

And then injected into you. And your kids.

Wow, don’t see any way that could go wrong, do you?

I mean, they’d test it out really – REALLY – intensely, right?

That’s the law, right? In accordance with the Food and Drug Administration’s own rules regarding the testing of drugs for human use, right?

Part 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, RIGHT???

Especially since this is a new, previously untested vaccine, made via a brand new technology – right? They’d test it really well…RIGHT???

Nope.

Again – from my Clinical Trials Monitoring source:

“Check the FDA’s announcement of Emergency Use of flu vaccines. Specifically for those under 1 year of age…”

http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm149571.htm

Note the appearance of the words “unapproved” and “uncleared” in the FDA’s news release?

Our Clinical Trials Monitor friend sure did:

“…and Bush’s power to DHHS with Project Bioshield. No one can sue pharmaceutical companies for vaccination injuries”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodefense_and_Pandemic_Vaccine_and_Drug_Development_Act_of_2005

“The Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of 2005 (S. 1873), nicknamed “Bioshield Two” aims to shortcut safety testing for new vaccines and drugs in case of a pandemic, and to protect vaccine makers and the pharmaceutical industry from legal liability for vaccine injuries.”

How nicely everything has been put together.

Remarkable!”

Yeah, it is remarkable.

Now, let’s see…FDA releases the Medical Industry from responsibility for using “unapproved” and “uncleared” products.

Bioshield releases the Pharma companies from any legal responsibility if people start to die.

Wow! And since “Novartis said more than 30 governments have requested vaccine supplies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, which placed a $289 million order in May”, we can all bet there’s going to be lots of money made.

Especially if mean old Mr. H1N1 forces the poor government to enact some kind of mandatory vaccination program.

Remarkable indeed.

June 1st, 2009 by admin

Back on the 26th of May, Mike Lynton, the Chairman and and CEO of Sony, published an article entitled: “Guardrails for the Internet: Preserving Creativity Online”. Lynton has gained a little bit of infamy for his line "I’m a guy who sees nothing good having come from the Internet. Period."

He and his ilk hate to see their positions as arbiters of power being stripped away by the internet.

Slashdot commenter Moryath put the ultimate beat-down on Lynton’s head. It was so spot-on, and so well spoken, that I feel compelled to re-print it here.

…

by Moryath (553296) on Tuesday May 26, @09:15AM

Quoting Lynton: “And my point is this: the major content businesses of the world and the most talented creators of that content — music, newspapers, movies and books — have all been seriously harmed by the Internet.”

Obviously what he really means is that the Internet is stopping the gatekeepers from controlling who can get published. There are more people publishing their own books independently – rather than having to go through, say, Del Rey – than ever before. The comic pages of the newspaper have been replaced by web comics but that’s not necessarily a bad thing either – either you adapt, like Scott Adams, or you don’t and you perish.

Quoting Lynton: “The Internet has brought people with no regard for the intellectual property of others together with a technology that allows them to easily steal that property and sell or give it away to everyone, with little fear of being caught or prosecuted.”

He doesn’t give a sh!t about "theft." He hates the idea of the Internet because it removes the need to keep his dumb ass as the distribution "gatekeeper" and skim money off of the hard work of others.

Prior to bittorrent, there was Samba sharing as enabled by several crawler-search setups. Prior to those, there was Napster. Prior to those, there were a zillion sites running FTP (ratio or otherwise). Prior to "the internet", there were BBS’es all over. Prior to that, there was sneaker net.

Go back ~100 years, and dumbsh!ts like this Sony retard were "protesting" and trying to lobby Congress to forbid municipalities from keeping lending libraries (you know, the public library system we all have the right to use for free) because it would "impede sales if people could simply borrow the book instead."

…

Wow. You go Moryath. Excellently said, and true, so true.

The web sure has obsoleted a lot of oligarchic old white men, and they hate it.

Too bad, times change, and their reign over publishing is over.

Go cry in the corner, emo Sony CEO. Cut yourself a little bit while you’re over there. There’s a plastic bag in the kitchen, if you tie it over your head real tight, all your whining, sniveling little problems will just go away.

I promise.

May 18th, 2009 by admin

You just can’t make this stuff up. May 14th, 2009, the New York Times runs an article about the training activities of “The Explorers” program, a coeducational affiliate of the Boy Scouts of America. The exercise?

“Training thousands of young people in skills used to confront terrorism, illegal immigration and escalating border violence.”

The target of this particular exercise?

I KID YOU NOT (and I quote): "a disgruntled Iraq war veteran”.

What the fu<k. Seriously.

A United States soldier?

A war veteran?

Has no one over at the Explorers program ever heard about the Hitler Youth?

You don’t give a fifteen year old boy a machine gun and a sense of authority. You give a fifteen year old boy a compass and a sense of DUTY. You don’t give a fifteen year old boy a license to kill.

Hell, you don’t even let a fifteen year old boy PRETEND to have a license to kill.

ONE OF THESE THINGS IS BAD, and it should be pretty obvious to any American which one it is:

The civil servants taking part in this “training” should do a little research on the Night of the Long Knives. Who you gonna call to come kill all the cops and soldiers after you’ve had them commit atrocities against the general public? A fifteen year old boy ?

Well, won’t that be wonderful for the New World Order?

Do you think the fifteen year old boy is going to have any respect for YOUR rights as a citizen?

Do you think the fifteen year old boy is going to have a strong sense of civil duty to his countrymen during a time of discord and civil strife?

Do you think the fifteen year old boy might just love having power and authority, blindly following whatever “The Leader” says, even if that means rounding up you and yours for a little trip to re-education camp?

Training for survival is good. Training for the safe and proper usage of firearms is good. Training in military studies is good.

Training teenagers to kill soldiers is BAD. Always has been, always will be. If your kid is in the Explorers Program, get him (or her) out now.

No excuses – today.

May 3rd, 2009 by admin

Muslims hate pigs. So much so that Egypt, in light of the current “Swine Flu” pandemic, are slaughtering thousands of pigs. Therefore we know, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that Islam prohibits the Good Muslim from having PIG inside the body. Let’s look at the Holy Qur’an 5:4:

“Forbidden to you for (food) are: …blood and the flesh of the swine ….”

The SWINE Flu is part SWINE, specifically, from the BLOOD OF THE SWINE. Therefore, any VACCINE or purported CURE would have to be created from, and at least partially made up of the BLOOD OF THE SWINE.

So, what is a Good Muslim to do?

If you are a really Good Practicing and Observant Muslim, you absolutely CAN NOT take a shot that contains swine blood.

If you do take a shot that contains swine blood, then you CAN NOT be a Good Practicing and Observant Muslim.

So, why do I bring this up? Ever heard of Albert Pike and his Three World Wars?

Pike was an architect of the New World Order. In the 19th Century Albert Pike established a framework for bringing about the New World Order.  He was totally SPOT ON about WWI and WWII. Albert Pike wrote a blueprint of events that would engineer the planned Third and Final World War.

He wrote:  "The Third World War must be  between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World”

Pretty straightforward huh?

Now, if you’re wondering if this is absurd…please just ask yourself…where are there reports of CONFIRMED flu?

Austria
Canada
China
Hong Kong
Costa Rica
Denmark
France
Germany
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Netherlands
New Zealand
Korea
Spain
Switzerland
United Kingdom

Nice cross-section of non-Arabic, non-Muslim Caucasoids, huh? Almost as if this initial run of the plague was meant to test whether or not Whiteys would survive it, eh?

If there was one – READ ME ONE – primarily Islamic country on that list, I’d not have posted this.

But there it is….Alayhis Salaam…so long Folks.

April 26th, 2009 by admin

Discover Magazine has published an article about the Australian "Antivax Movement".

It’s a heartbreaker about a child who wasn’t vaccinated and acquired a cough and died. Which is totally sad, and I feel for the family.

BUT

Vaccines also kill. That’s why the United States has the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The Discover Magazine hit piece makes no acknowledgement of that fact. In fact, the piece is a vicious attack on conscientious objectors…let me quote:

Yelling? GARBAGE?!?!

Hey, buddy, why don’t you pay a little visit to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) site:

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5201a1.htm

Please allow me to quote again:

"From January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2001, VAERS received 128,717 case reports describing adverse events after immunization.

Overall, 14.2% of all reports received in VAERS during 1991–2001 described serious adverse events (10) (Table 9).

A clinical research team follows up on all deaths reported to VAERS. The majority of these deaths were ultimately classified as sudden infant death syndrome."

Math = over 18,000 kids "suddenly died" after vaccination according to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

My heart goes out to the subject of the Discover article, but it also goes out to the parents and families of those eighteen thousand kids.

No one who can count to eighteen thousand should be attacked in the way that this article attacks them.

And if you really want to be  sickened, read some of the comments on that article.

Pure propaganda.