December 29th, 2008 by admin

I’ve been seeing the “Jesusland” meme on the internet for some time now. If you are not familiar with it, it goes something like this:

Let the swath of the US that is utterly and unabashedly Christian (before American) secede, and become a country known as “Jesusland”.

According to Wikipedia, the idea comes from a map created shortly after the 2004 United States Presidential election, which satirizes the red/blue states scheme.

So…I have been thinking about it, and be it unpatriotic or not, I think I agree with the idea.

Get this:

An article posted in the Wall Street Journal quotes  Russian academic Igor Panarin predicting that the United States will shortly break into six states.

In  the article, it says “Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces…”

So, here’s Panarin’s Map:

As a lifelong American citizen, I have to tell you, that map is scary.

Not only do I not like the idea of these several portions being under the influence of foreign powers like the EU and China, I do not like the idea of a “Balkanized” North American continent.

So?

Given my druthers, I would rather see an America that is split into two pieces. Jesusland would look something like this:

A “North” America, holding onto the Constitution set down so many long years ago, and a “South” that still respects those Constitutional ideas, secondary to an allegiance to the Christian Bible.

Why?

The Constitution of the US, with all of its faults, is still (in your author’s opinion) the best blueprint for the creation and operation of a nation that has ever been created. I would much rather see a “Jesusland” on my Southern border that holds a deep respect and affiliation to that document, than to see six states “under the influencce” of powers that have no respect (or even a disdain) for that Constitution.

I personally would not want to live in Jesusland.

The events occurring in the Middle East during all the days of my life (and the three thousand or so years previous) have given me strong opinions regarding the separation of church and state.

Still, being a spiritual person from a deeply religious background, I can respect those who do not trust the lofty goals of mankind over the edicts of a supernatural God. 

At the end of the day, I accept that the United States can not go forward into the future as it has been in the past.

The most logical, mutually beneficial solution for the populace that shares this land is for the “Jeezlanders” to get their own country, and for those of us who cling to the tattered remnants of that ancient document known as “the Constitution of the Unites States of America” to get a county separtate from them.

It beats all hell out f the alternative.

Are you a “Jeezlander”?

Perhaps you’d like to show your affiliation with a tee bearing the graphic from this article?

Support the existence of this blog by buying tees bearing the Jesusland icons containted herein:

Jesusland Seal tee

Jesusland Creed tee

December 15th, 2008 by admin

The obvious reason why the West is at war with Islam was published – in no uncertain terms – in the magazine “The Week” in their Vol 8 edition, Issue 391 (dated 12DEC08) .

Quite simply, the war is about banking systems.

The entire economic structure of “the West” is based upon the charging of interest for loans and the charging of interest for the issuance of currecy. 

Factually, the Islamic religion prohibits the charging of interest.

To wit:

On page 42 of the Vol 8 edition of “The Week”, Murice Greenberg of the Wall Street Journal is quoted, saying:

“…the Federal Reserve gave AIG…an $85 billion line of credit at a PUNITIVE INTEREST RATE of more than 14 percent”

Punitive interest rates? Not only is the charging of interest a source of evil power, it can be used as a punishment!

Two pages earlier in the edition (page 40), Frederik Balfour of Business Week is quoted saying:

“Muslims must avoid…charging interest on loans”

How much plainer can it get? Not only are Muslims prohibited from aquiring “excessive debt”, but they simply may NOT charge money for the loaning of money.

And that is the reason for war.

Think about it this way – if you live in NYC, and you go to the bank to borrow $20k for a new work truck for the sake of the success of your business, the Western Bank says “Here, take this $20k, go buy a truck, which we (the bank) will own. If you manage to pay us back $23000, you will have a truck, and we’ll have $3000 profit. If you fail, we will have a truck, and you will be our debt slave until you pay us $23000.”

Whether you succeed or fail in your business – the BANK WINS.

If you live in an Islamic country, and you go to the bank to borrow $20k for a new work truck for the sake of the success of your business, the only way the bank can make any money out of the loan is by becoming a partner with you, and sharing in the profit from your success. If you fail, not only do you lose – the BANK LOSES TOO.

The Banking families of the West – the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Goldmans and Sachs, who control the governments of the West through the issuance of currency, have demanded war with the Islamic world so as to prevent the loss of the power they hold by means of charging interest on loans and the issuance of currency.

They cannot bear the competition of a banking system that does not charge interest.

No one will point this out to you, because television networks, newspapers and mainstream internet portals are all in debt to those same families.

Was it not Henry Paulson of Goldman Sachs who went to the US House and, according to Sen Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, threatened to institute Martial Law if the citizens United States would not give him $700 billion, no strings attached? How can anyone deny that the government of the United States is held hostage to the banking families when that kind of event can occur?

Yes, there are differences between the cultures and societies of the Western World and the Islamic World. None of those differences are great enough (or pressing enough) to excuse the situation we find the world in today. The truth is plain, published, printed and profound.

The fastest and simplest way to peace on earth, or at least a peace between the West and the Islamic World, is the elimination of the power of the western banking families to issue currency and charge interest on loans.

December 4th, 2008 by admin

UPDATE: 08JAN09 – Bizjournals.com is reporting today that “Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (NYSE:ANF) posted a 24 percent plunge in same-store receipts for the month.” The month in question is December, 2008…that’s right – Christmas. My dancing shoes are ready…

It was Nov. 26, 2008. The website 24/7 Wall St. ran a delicious article entitled: “The Black Friday Ten: Retailers Who May Not See 2009″.

Great article about the death of a few of the “luxury” mall holes that bruise the face of the United States. It was fun to poke at J. Jill, Talbots, Williams-Sonoma, and Saks. The thought of their snotty mall staff looking for work at Ross or K Mart gave me a titter.

But what of the great unholy evil that is ABERCROMBIE AND FITCH?

What of the nazi clothing store? What of the Klu Klux Klotheir (that hired my black cousin, but never actually put him on the schedule)?

Would Black Friday (get it – BLACK Friday) bring the hammer down on these assholes?

Well, it looks like the Spirit in the Sky is dealing out the justice, and yes, Abernazi & Bitch will cease to exist. The Huffington Post today reported that “Teen retailer Abercrombie & Fitch, which has resisted deep discounting, saw a 28 percent same-store sales drop” in November. Hot DAMN!!!

I have my shoes and I can’t wait to go to my local mall and Stomp Dance in front of the gaping maw that used to be occupied by the Fascist Fashion hole!

December 1st, 2008 by admin

BBC is reporting today that Indian Muslims say they do not want the gunmen killed by the security forces during the attacks in Mumbai to be buried in Muslim graveyards.

Why not? Well, according to Ibrahim Tai, the president of the Indian Muslim Council,  they (the terrorists) had “defamed” his religion. He is quoted as saying, “They are not Muslims as they have not followed our religion which teaches us to live in peace.”

How about that. The man is taking the RELIGION just as seriously as the POLITICS.

What a fine lesson for all the other Muslim citizens of the world. Put your money where your mouth is. If Islam is a religion of peace, and terrorsits defame it, let their corpses rot in the street, rather than giving them a grand parade.

Amazing, in a small way, that it has taken so long for a Muslim to stand up on the world stage and let us all know that there really are people out there facing Mecca each day with a true conviction in their hearts – a conviction that goes deep enough to demand consequences of those who claim to follow Muhammed, yet not obey his teachings.

Rock on my Indian neighbors, rock on.